Scooters

Sep. 3rd, 2007 11:03 pm
bunrab: (Default)
We went to the state fair on Sunday, and right inside the gate where we entered was "Rent a Ride" which was renting strollers and other kiddie vehicles - and a couple of electric mobility scooters (similar to the ones that most supermarkets have, though a bit smaller.) Well, it was warm, and the fairgrounds were large - so I rented one. And it was great! It made things SO much easier! I never would have made it all the way over to the livestock barns without the scooter.

Yes, there are people who treat anyone in a wheelchair (a category that tends to include seated-type mobility scooters) as mentally disabled as well as physically, but those people don't matter. Mostly, people are OK with it. I got some funny looks because, as usual, I don't "look like" a person with a disability. But in general it was useful, and it served as an opportunity to open some conversations. And in fact, in several exhibit areas, I was able to have much longer conversations with the people in charge, because sitting on the scooter put me at eye level with people sitting in chairs behind their tables. So I talked to the people in charge of the quilt exhibit, including the lady who made the quilt that was put on the official fair poster, and the people in charge of the needlework categories, and one of the rabbit show exhibitors, and I was at eye level to talk with several kids who were looking at the fancy ducks and chickens at the same time I was. There was a polka-duck! A polka-dotted duck, honest.

And the guy who rented out the scoots was also very friendly and chatty; we had fun talking about everything from electric vehicles in general to disabilities in general to culture.

So, with all that, I decided it's finally time to start looking for a scooter to own. But I'm not sure I'm ready yet to purchase a real disabled-person, expensive scooter (like this one or this one), especially since I *don't* have Medicare or Medicaid to help pay for it, and my insurance certainly wouldn't pay for it. So I went looking at recreational electric scooters. After looking at this Schwinn and this Currie and something called X-treme and even more X-treme finally **here's what I ordered. ** I ordered the burgundy color, and it comes with the seat. Notice the cool little trunk box. It's being ground shipped, so it'll be a week or more before I get it, but I will report on it as soon as it arrives!

I think probably a lot of people wouldn't let a recreational electric scooter indoors the way they would a mobility scooter, but the seat and trunk box on this one make it look more like a purposeful tool than a recreational toy, and that should make the difference - I think most places will accept its presence as the equivalent of a mobility scooter, as long as I don't make any attempts to go full speed! Normal speed for the mobility scooters is about 4 mph, and I'll keep this scoot down to that when I'm indoors or in crowded conditions like the fair.

It folds up, and can be put in a car trunk.

I can go to the zoo again! I had been avoiding the zoo, as a very long walk outdoors on hilly terrain; this should be *PERFECT* for the zoo!

I can hardly wait!
bunrab: (Default)
This article mentions a useful web site!
U.S. Health Experts Rate Hospitals' Cardiac Care

June 22 (HealthDay News) -- U.S. health officials have rated the nation's hospitals on their treatment of heart attack and heart failure and found that most meet the national average for quality of care.

Scoring 4,700 centers across the country, experts at the Department of Health and Human Services took into account heart-related death rates as well as the mix of patients at each hospital to come up with their findings. Speaking during a Thursday teleconference, they said most hospitals fell within the national average, although dozens performed either better or worse.

And thanks to a new federal Web site launched Thursday, U.S. consumers can now go online and check their local hospital's performance when it comes to heart care.

"The steps we are taking today mean that patients will have the information they need to make decisions about their own care," Mike Leavitt, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said during an afternoon teleconference.

The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Web site, http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov, now lists hospital mortality rates for more than 4,500 U.S. hospitals. The statistics involve deaths from heart attacks and heart failure for Medicare patients who died within 30 days after their hospital stay.

"For the first time, Medicare and the Hospital Quality Alliance are providing the public with information about two important yardsticks of care -- mortality rates for heart attack and heart failure," Leavitt said.

"This is important," Leavitt added, "because for most of its history, Medicare has been paying for services, but not paying for results. The problem with that approach is that it doesn't provide any incentive to improve the quality or lower the cost."

Leavitt noted that in 2006, 36 million people visited the Medicare Web site looking for comparative health information. "When that many people start comparing the quality and cost of health care, the result can only be better care at lower cost," he said.

In terms of its functionality, consumers can go to the Web site and select hospitals, as well as specific criteria of care, to view. Hospitals are rated against the national average for care in each category.

"The information is displayed in three categories: no different from the U.S. national average; better than the U.S. national average; worse than the U.S. national average," Herb Kuhn, acting deputy administrator of the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said during the teleconference.

In addition, Kuhn expects that hospitals will use this information to improve their quality of care and patient outcomes. "By bringing this information forward, we can shed a little sunshine and provide a catalyst to push for improvement in health care," he said.

Kuhn said his agency has also contacted local Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs) who will work with hospitals that currently have cardiovascular mortality rates that are worse than the national average to help them improve their care.

"We are proud that Medicare officials have turned to the QIOs to address this very serious problem," David Schulke, executive vice president of the American Health Quality Association (AHQA), said in a prepared statement.

"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has authorized an additional $2,000 per hospital to spend on efforts to help these hospitals," Schulke said. "In many states, it may turn out that this amount is a down payment on the actual work that will be required to identify and change care processes necessary to prevent future deaths," he said.

The agency is also using the Web site to post its first annual update of pricing and volume information on certain elective hospital procedures.


SOURCES: June 21, 2007, teleconference with: Mike Leavitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Herb Kuhn, Acting Deputy Administrator, U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; statement, American Health Quality Association
bunrab: (Default)
I apologize for not posting for a bit. My spouse, [livejournal.com profile] squirrel_magnet, was out of town attending to his father, who is 92 and has lung cancer. Luckily, the prognosis has improved, and so the Squirrel is back home for a while. I was taking care of the chores that he normally does, and not doing that terrific a job of it. Feeding the cats and cleaning their litter box involves going down to the basement - and then coming back up the stairs, not something I do enthusiastically. Also, the cats do not like the way I feed them, and I use the wrong stance when cleaning the litter box, or something - anyway, they disapprove. And there's other stuff I'm not real good at - carrying out the recycling, taking out garbage, stuff like that. The cats are glad to have S back doing his chores, and I am too - and glad he's back for many other reasons, of course.

I wanted to mention a website I recently found: http://www.sparkpeople.com . It's mainly a site for helping people lose weight - - but their food tracking feature also is very good for tracking sodium intake. It brought me up short, because when I started logging everything I eat, I saw how careless I had been getting about sodium in restaurant food, and seeing it adding up like that brought me back to my senses; I have been making much better choices this week, after a week of seeing that my intake came to 2200-2500 on some days; now I've got it back down to 1500-1800 milligrams of sodium per day. It's completely free to register at the site. There are a bunch of interesting features, a huge recipe database, and lots of forums/bulletin boards/communities within the site, including teams for hypertension, lower salt intake, heart health, animal lovers, people over 50, and just about every other demographic slice you might think of.  I'm actually having fun with it!

It's summer! If you're taking diuretics, don't forget that they can make you more sensitive to sunburn.

Profile

bunrab: (Default)
bunrab

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 06:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios